A meeting agenda of an August 2015 US TAG 176 meeting chaired by Lorri Hunt shows the group spent as much time eating lunch as they did conducting official review of US comments on the FDIS of ISO 9001.

The agenda for a Washington DC meeting of the US TAG 176’s Task Group for 9001 shows the FDIS review meeting began at 12:15 PM and then broke for an hourlong lunch only 45 minutes later.
TAGlunch

The agenda then shows the group spent an hour discussing “FDIS WebEx Results” which, sources tell Oxebridge, was an exercise in collecting FDIS comments already received by the group from three previous meetings in July and August. Those meetings were highly restricted, as revealed in a separate Hunt presentation which claimed “US TAG members were allowed to chat technical concerns [but] topics were not debated.

The group then spent only an hour “reviewing” the issues. That review period would have been the most critical, as it was when the TAG would determine which comments would impact on official TAG positions, but the review was only given an hour of the committee’s time. Instead, it appears the topics were merely collated into an Excel spreadsheet which analyzed the clauses to which they were assigned.

The final hour was a report given by Ms. Hunt, which included a lengthy reminder of TAG code of conduct rules and a menacing reminder not to share TAG “information,” something not upheld by any ANSI rule known to Oxebridge. Ironically, the presentation included a reminder for the TAG to “uphold the key principles of International Standardization: consensus, transparency, openness, impartiality, effectiveness, relevance, coherence and the development dimension.” The meeting would appear to have been a violation of at least a few of those key ISO principles.

The US TAG 176 would go on to vote to approve the FDIS 9001, against growing stakeholder criticism of both the standard and the TAG’s development activities.

 

 

Advertisements

Aerospace Exports Inc

Why we report on these topics

Since 2000, Oxebridge has worked to improve ISO and related certification schemes by identifying problems and then proposing solutions. We report on issues affecting standards users because so few other news outlets do. Our belief is that in order to fix the problems in these schemes, we must first understand the nature and breadth of those problems. Our reporting aims to do just that. Elsewhere on the Oxebridge site you will find White Papers and other articles proposing ideas to correct these problems.