{"id":8705,"date":"2016-11-18T10:17:38","date_gmt":"2016-11-18T15:17:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/?p=8705"},"modified":"2016-11-18T10:17:38","modified_gmt":"2016-11-18T15:17:38","slug":"the-cash-machine-keeps-ringing-iso-releases-another-guidance-document-for-iso-9001","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/the-cash-machine-keeps-ringing-iso-releases-another-guidance-document-for-iso-9001\/","title":{"rendered":"The Cash Machine Keeps Ringing &#8211; ISO Releases (Another) Guidance Document for ISO 9001"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Only days after it <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/new-iso-9002-standard-released-with-predictable-confusion\/\">released<\/a> the nonsensical ISO\/TS 9002 &#8220;guidance document&#8221; on implementing ISO 9001 &#8212; a standard that&#8217;s not supposed to need any guidance documents in order to understand &#8212; the ISO publishing machine has churned out another garbage document, this one a 180+ page monstrosity called &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.iso.org\/iso\/iso_9001_2015_for_small_enterprises-preview.pdf\"><em><strong>ISO 9001 for Small Enterprises &#8212; What to Do? &#8211; Advice from ISO\/TC 176<\/strong><\/em><\/a>&#8220;.\u00a0Or, as I prefer to call it, &#8220;<em><strong>ISO 9001: WTF?<\/strong><\/em>&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>ISO was so sure you&#8217;d hate it, they didn&#8217;t even follow their typical pricing model, which is based on page count. Rather than charge the regular\u00a0rate of over 200 CHF for a 180 page document, they priced this in the gutter are a mere 38 CHF (about $40 US). That&#8217;s a bargain, but considering they shouldn&#8217;t charge people at all for what&#8217;s basically an advertisement, it&#8217;s still an insane ripoff. Don&#8217;t fret, though, no doubt in a few weeks it will be uploaded do the web, just like the Thai delegation did with their official copy of ISO 9001:2015 (Google it.) Idiots.<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;re a standards nerd like me, you&#8217;d be interested to know if these craven attempts at needlessly wringing cash from users&#8217; pockets violated any ISO rules or procedures, and of course the answer is yet. The ISO Directives Part 2 &#8220;<em>Rules for the structure and drafting of International Standards<\/em>&#8221; clause 4.1 clearly states that any ISO standards must be easily understood. Here&#8217;s the exact requirement:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>4.1 Objective<br \/>\nThe objective of documents published by ISO and IEC is to define <em><strong>clear and unambiguous\u00a0provisions<\/strong><\/em> in order to facilitate international trade and communication. To achieve this\u00a0objective, the document shall:<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 be as <em><strong>complete as necessary<\/strong> <\/em>within the limits specified by its scope,<br \/>\n\u2022 be <em><strong>consistent, clear<\/strong><\/em> and accurate,<br \/>\n\u2022 be <em><strong>comprehensible to qualified persons who have not participated in its preparation<\/strong><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Clearly, if ISO has to publish dozens of additional standards, PowerPoint slide decks, official &#8220;N&#8221; publications, FAQ&#8217;s and endless seminars, the standard does not meet the requirements of being &#8220;clear and comprehensible.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But remember: ISO is a publishing company, not a standards developer, and when you understand that, it makes perfect sense.<\/p>\n<p>Ironically, the US TAG to TC 716 put up a half-hearted gripe about the need for these documents, but it was eventually overruled and now those same US TAG leaders are beating the pavement selling their own books and seminars &#8212; at grossly inflated prices &#8212; to anyone willing to listen.<\/p>\n<p>I won&#8217;t even provide a link to this thing, since I don&#8217;t recommend you buy it.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ISO releases yet another document designed to explain ISO 9001.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":8527,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","mc4wp_mailchimp_campaign":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[43,14,116,558,42,41],"class_list":["post-8705","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-opinion","tag-iso","tag-iso-9001","tag-iso-90012015","tag-sme","tag-tc-176","tag-us-tag","et-has-post-format-content","et_post_format-et-post-format-standard"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8705","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8705"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8705\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9105,"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8705\/revisions\/9105"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8527"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8705"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8705"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8705"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}