{"id":24581,"date":"2021-05-04T09:31:38","date_gmt":"2021-05-04T13:31:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/?p=24581"},"modified":"2021-05-04T09:33:10","modified_gmt":"2021-05-04T13:33:10","slug":"nsfw-even-isos-dildo-committee-rejected-its-latest-definition-of-risk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/nsfw-even-isos-dildo-committee-rejected-its-latest-definition-of-risk\/","title":{"rendered":"NSFW: Even ISO&#8217;s Dildo Committee Rejected Its Latest Definition of &#8220;Risk&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m sure few of you even knew that ISO was trying to standardize your dildos, but they are. The committee <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iso.org\/committee\/7647858\/x\/catalogue\/p\/0\/u\/1\/w\/0\/d\/0\">ISO\/PC 325<\/a> was set up a few years ago to develop a standard for &#8220;<em>sex toys: design and safety requirements for products in direct contact with genitalia, the anus, or both.<\/em>&#8221; The resulting draft is currently called ISO\/DIS 3533 and if you shift the numbers sideways a bit, they do sort of look like boobs:<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-24582 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/3533.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"71\" height=\"15\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/3533.png 71w, https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/3533-24x5.png 24w, https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/3533-36x8.png 36w, https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/3533-48x10.png 48w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 71px) 100vw, 71px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Those of you who get your kink on by stuffing things in <em><strong>other<\/strong> <\/em>orifices, like your ears, are out of luck, because ISO is being decidedly judgmental on your habits. Prudes.<\/p>\n<p>What&#8217;s interesting, however, is that the draft standard &#8212; which <a href=\"https:\/\/www.iso.org\/standard\/79631.html?browse=tc\">you can buy<\/a> for 58 Swiss francs,\u00a0 shipped in a plain brown wrapper &#8212; rejects ISO&#8217;s most recent definition of the term &#8220;risk,&#8221; and relies on an older one which makes more sense. As you may remember, ISO is trying to sell the world on the idea that <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/swiss-proposal-would-add-41st-definition-of-risk\/\">risks are good<\/a>, while the rest of the world understands that uncertainty is neutral, and when the effect is <em><strong>bad<\/strong><\/em>, it&#8217;s a risk. That&#8217;s why we engage in risk <em><strong>mitigation<\/strong><\/em>; you don&#8217;t &#8220;mitigate&#8221; things that are good.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, ISO\/DIS 3533 utilizes an older 1999 definition whereby risk is inherently bad: &#8220;<em>combination of the probability of occurrence of harm and the severity of that harm.<\/em>&#8221; Now, those of you who <em><strong>like<\/strong> <\/em>running to the hospital when your sex toy has been inserted in a way that will require medical intervention may disagree, and prefer ISO&#8217;s preferred definition, &#8220;<em>effect of uncertainty on objectives.<\/em>&#8221; If you&#8217;re cruising for hot proctologists, then sure, I can see why you&#8217;d be upset by the use of the 1999 version.<\/p>\n<p>Frankly, I didn&#8217;t buy the actual standard and only reviewed the sample text because, you know, browser history. But I&#8217;m tempted, if only to read Annex B &#8220;Design Considerations Based on Anatomy,&#8221; and then the three sections on &#8220;Small,&#8221; &#8220;Medium,&#8221; and &#8220;Large.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>On another note, I&#8217;ll pay $500 to anyone who can get me a photo of the ISO\/PC 325 committee members sitting in a meeting room holding dildos. Because I have a lot of ways I can use that photo.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yes, they have a committee for that.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":24583,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","mc4wp_mailchimp_campaign":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[157],"tags":[43,7832,7834,7833],"class_list":["post-24581","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-humor-2","tag-iso","tag-iso-dis-3533","tag-iso-pc-325","tag-sex-toys","et-has-post-format-content","et_post_format-et-post-format-standard"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24581","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24581"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24581\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24585,"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24581\/revisions\/24585"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24583"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24581"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24581"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.oxebridge.com\/emma\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24581"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}