AS9100 Rev D Draft – Early Look at the Expected Changes
Oxebridge gets an early look at AS9100 Rev D, the upcoming revision to the aerospace QMS standard.
Tag: AS9100 Rev. C
![AAQG May Have Lied in its Rejection of Oxebridge VP Membership [UPDATED]](https://www.oxebridge.com/emma/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/iaqgslide2-627x376.jpg)
AAQG May Have Lied in its Rejection of Oxebridge VP Membership [UPDATED]
AAQG claims anyone working on the committee responsible for AS9100 must be doing so as an “individual” and not a representative of any employer. So why are the current representatives acting under the names of companies like Boeing, Lockheed and Rockwell?
AS9100 Configuration Management for the Small Machine Shop
AS9100’s requirements for configuration management (CM) are well understood by the massive...
IAQG Presentation on the Future of AS9100
The International Aerospace Quality Group has released a presentation on future developments for AS9100, including how the upcoming revision to ISO 9001 will affect the aerospace standard. You may download the presentation here....
AS9101E — Goodbye OER, Hello PEAR 2.0
IAQG’s Registration Management Committee (RMC) is circulating a sudden revision to AS9101, the rules for auditing under AS9100. The Rev. E draft takes into consideration some market realities pushed by the CB’s and...
“PEAR Controversy” to be Escalated to IAF
Tampa FL — The debate over whether AS9100 certification body auditors may request, or even require, audit clients to complete their own evidence reports prior to the audit is being escalated to the...
IAQG RMC: OK for Clients to Complete PEARs for AS9100 Auditors
Winter Haven FL — Responding to a formal request for clarification on the use of PEAR forms during AS9100 Rev C audits, the International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG) has issued an opinion to Oxebridge. The request for...
AS9100 C: Windfall for Prime OEMs, Boondoggle for Users?
by Christopher Paris As more and more supporting documents, facts and actual audit experiences leak out, one thing is becoming clear: AS9100 revision C is a very different animal than its predecessor, Rev. B. But a page-to-page...
In Attempt to Avoid Criticism, AAQG Bans Self
by Christopher Paris It’s been a tough week to be an internet representative of the Americas Aerospace Quality Group. Criticism had already been building from AS9100 end users at the botched rollout of various supporting...
Atlantic Aero to Add AS9110, Expand Scope of AS9100
Greensboro NC — Atlantic Aero Incorporated is expanding the scope of its aerospace QMS certifications to include its Greensboro-based aircraft repair station, as well as its Engineering Services division. The...
New AS rules: Can’t Fire Your Registrar for Bogus Audit Findings
by Christopher Paris SAE finally released AS9104/1, the document which defines some key rules for certification bodies (“CB’s, or registrars) when conducting AS9100/AS9110/AS9120 certification audits. Never mind that...
LinkedIn Debate: “Should AS9100 Auditors Judge QMS Effectiveness?”
A debated on LinkedIn.com has been launched to discuss whether AS9100 registration auditors should merely determine a company’s conformity to the AS9100 standard, or whether they should also judge the effectiveness of the...
