Oxebridge Seeking Legal Remedies to Stop AS9100 Nonconformity “Quotas”
New rules would allow aerospace CBs to generate profit from bogus nonconformities, while masking the practice as a performance metric.
New rules would allow aerospace CBs to generate profit from bogus nonconformities, while masking the practice as a performance metric.
The new AS9104/3 rules will force auditors to write nonconformities, regardless of objective evidence.
IAQG execs’ disinterest in ensuring AS9100 certifications are only issued to conforming companies eventually puts the public at risk.
Auditors falsifying actual audit duration is theft, and could easily by shut down by Accreditation Bodies.
Oxebridge provides guidance on implementing Human Factors controls in an aerospace manufacturing environment.
The Registration Management Committee is refusing to take up a complaint filed with it against Probitas, the AS9100 auditor certification body.
Oxebridge has escalated a complaint against the AS9100 auditor certification body Probitas to the Registration Management Committee.
Probitas Authentication has deleted its Code of Conduct for aerospace auditors after receiving a complaint it was refusing to enforce the code by ignoring auditors who falsified information.
In 2014, Boeing’s Tim Lee gave a presentation for the AAQG in which he claimed unaccredited AS9100 certificates are “fake” and “counterfeit,” thus exposing himself and the AAQG to a defamation suit.
The IAQG’s Strategic Plan appears to contradict the SAE governing rules on whether members are individuals or companies.
The new IAQG nonconformity “cause codes” are not only dumb, they are guaranteed to get you sued in court.
The IAQG has rejected calls for a 2-year postponement of its AS9100 certification transition deadline, despite backlash from the supply chain and a dramatic lack of qualified auditors.